Jump Trading SDE interview experience sharing|Programhelp Remote assistance accompanied by the whole process, the card point broken in seconds!

1,166 Views
No Comment

Jump Trading As a top high-frequency trading company in the financial circle, the technical requirements are quite high, and the SDE interview is quite challenging. The difficulty of the questions is not easy, the algorithm part is hard, the system design and language implementation must be solid, and the pace of the interview is quite fast. For me, Programhelp's remote voice assistance really helped me a lot to pass the interview, especially when I was stuck, I was woken up by a sentence, and the efficiency was directly doubled.

Preparing for an interview: how to plan your revision efficiently

Jump Trading is one of the top fintech companies, and it's easy to get stuck if you're not well-prepared. I didn't know much about the types of questions at first, but luckily I had a library of real questions from previous years and a list of specialized questions provided by Programhelp.

The assistants helped me customize review plans specifically for graph theory, data structures, language implementation, and system design. For example:

  • Algorithmic questions focus on brushing up on classics such as minimum spanning trees, graph transformations, and chained table intersections.
  • The language section has special simulations for C++ memory management and Python GIL.
  • When I was preparing for the behavioral interview, my assistant helped me to sort out the STAR framework and typical answers to questions, and the voice reminders on the spot helped me to answer in a clear way.

This kind of targeted preparation is so much more efficient than blindly brushing up on questions.

One Side (45min) - hard Algorithm question MST conversion method

One side of the question is quite difficult, the first time I wrote a violent solution, to stabilize the basic disk. When I got stuck in the optimization part, my assistant reminded me by voice that I could transform it from the graph theory point of view, so I immediately switched my thoughts and successfully turned the problem into a minimum spanning tree. The atmosphere at the scene relaxed, and the interviewer was quite satisfied.

In fact, without this help, I'd probably be dead in the water for quite a while if I got stuck. The helper also saved me a lot of time by keeping an eye on the details of the code and reminding not to forget the boundary conditions to avoid making low-level mistakes.

Onsite Four Wheel Review

Round 1 (60min) - Realize a fixed-length key for the unordered_map

The key length is fixed at 6 characters, and the range of characters is limited. This question is more about details and data structure design. I started to struggle with how to do the hashing and re-hashing mechanism, but my assistant woke me up with her voice, don't complicate it, just use base-52 encoding to do the key to integer, the performance will be much better.

When I was struggling with whether or not to use the chained-list method, my helper reminded me that open-addressing is simple and efficient, especially for this small key scenario. The timing and implementation details of the rehashing trigger also gave me ideas. Remote ghostwriting helped me improve the pseudo-code and boundary processing, and the code is more complete.

Round 2 (60min) - C++ vs Python Language Comparison

The interviewer asked me to choose two languages to compare, and I chose C++ and Python. honestly, this kind of open-ended question is very important to practice in general. programhelp helped me in the simulation to clarify all aspects of the comparison, from the type system, memory management, performance bottlenecks, GIL concurrency limitations, to the actual engineering applications.

When I answered the questions, my assistant reminded me to talk about specific project experiences, not just theories, so I was able to talk about the advantages and disadvantages of the two languages in a clear and in-depth manner, and the interviewer responded quite well.

Round 3 (30min) - HR Behavioral Interviews

This round is relatively easy, but the answers should be real and not empty. programhelp helped me prepare several behavioral question answer templates and structural frameworks in advance, and reminded me to use the STAR rule during the interview to control the key points and time of the answers.

I was able to answer questions like "Why Jump Trading?" and "What was my favorite company in my past internships?" in a clear and natural way without stuttering.

Round 4 (60min) - Team Lead round, hardcore questions with live assists

write by hand shared_ptr At first, I didn't understand the thread safety and exception safety of reference counting, and the voice assistant immediately helped me to organize my thoughts and reminded me to use atomic and RAII modes to restructure the code in a more reasonable way.

For the chained table intersection question, the assistants helped me quickly come up with a double pointer synchronization walk and also warned about boundary cases.

Designing news push protocol questions, the assistants helped me to sort out the message flow, reliability mechanism and extension scheme, and the mock Q&A session was also very practical and helped me to answer more confidently.

ProgramhelpIt's not just a ghostwriter, it's an invisible teammate.

Many people think that remote assistance is to help write code, but Programhelp remote voice assistance is actually more like a personal coach. When you get stuck in your thinking, the helper will remind you by voice, "Can I use graph theory to transform this problem?", "shared_ptr should be thread-safe, try atomic refcount". The programhelp remote voice assistance will remind you that "Can you use graphical transformation in this problem?", "Be careful of thread safety in shared_ptr, try atomic refcount", "Don't forget the double pointer technique in chain table", and so on.

My particular favorite is:

  • The assistants are always available to help me review boundary conditions and complexity to avoid writing errors or omissions.
  • There was control over the pace of answering the questions to prevent me from getting bogged down in detail deadlock and to ensure that the time allocation was reasonable.
  • Repeatedly helped me adjust my answer logic and expression during mock interviews to improve my communication confidence.

I really feel that Programhelp is not only a question helper, but also my "invisible teammate".

author avatar
jor jor
END
 0
Comment(No Comment)