今天上午刚带一位学员刚做完 MathWorks 的最新 OA,两道编程题全程只花了 15 分钟就 AC 掉了,整体难度中等偏下,偏重基础逻辑与模拟实现。下面整理一下题目与思路,给还没做的同学参考一下。
Q1: Valid Parentheses String
Problem:
You are given several strings containing only parentheses characters '(', ')', '{', '}', '[', ']'.
For each string, determine if it is valid — meaning all brackets are closed and ordered correctly.
Solution Idea:
Use a stack to simulate the matching process.
- Traverse each character:
- If it’s an opening bracket, push it to the stack.
- If it’s a closing bracket, check whether it matches the top element of the stack.
- If it matches, pop; otherwise, return invalid immediately.
At the end, if the stack is empty, the string is valid.
This is basically the LeetCode “Valid Parentheses” template question — super straightforward, perfect warm-up.
Q2: Maximum Overlapping Team Size
Problem:
You are given n time intervals representing the working hours of different teams.
Find the maximum number of teams that are active (overlapping) at the same time.
Solution Idea:
Classic interval overlap problem — similar to “Meeting Rooms II.”
- Extract all start and end points.
- Mark starts as
+1, ends as-1. - Sort all points by time, and accumulate the counts.
- Keep track of the maximum cumulative value — that’s the maximum overlapping team size.
It can also be done via prefix counting or sweep line method; both are efficient since the input size is small.
OA Overall Review
这次 OA 两道题都非常常规,难度和 LeetCode Easy ~ Medium 持平。
系统界面简洁,输入输出没坑,时间 60 分钟足够。学员因为之前在我们这边练过几次“逻辑+实现题”模拟,整个流程几乎是 autopilot 模式,全程稳到不行。
MathWorks 的 OA 没有算法陷阱,考的其实就是 coding 手感和基础题熟练度,节奏和沟通感比技巧更重要。
FAQ:MathWorks OA 常见疑问
Q1: OA 是在什么平台做的?
官方自家平台,界面清爽稳定,不需要额外安装插件。
Q2: 有没有拍摄或监控?
没有摄像头监控,但全程录屏检测环境,不建议切屏。
Q3: 题目风格?
偏向基础算法和逻辑题,代码要求简洁清晰,不考奇技淫巧。
Q4: 难度相比其他公司?
明显比金融类 OA(Citadel、IMC)轻松,也比 Amazon OA 简单,属于“纯 coding 实现”型测试。
Programhelp 让你在实战中突出重围
MathWorks 这种逻辑+实现型 OA,最容易在细节上掉分(边界、格式、时间管理)。我们这边提供的 远程无痕助攻方案,能在限定时间内帮你:
- 实时语音提醒输入输出规范;
- 模拟官方环境预演;
- 联机无痕协作,保证代码节奏与思路同步;
- 附赠常见题型复盘。
不少同学靠这套方案稳稳拿到 MathWorks、NVIDIA、Stripe 等公司面邀。
如果你也想提前预演 OA 节奏,欢迎私信了解最新方案。